Featured Articles

VW Jetta BlueTDI to bring 60mpg to North America

Posted in Diesel, Emissions, Volkswagen by Corey | April 28th, 2008 | 8 Responses |

VWJettaBlueTDI-2.jpg picture by willfusion

Volkswagen announces that their BlueTDI technology is now ready for the North American market, but is America still unprepared to embrace a diesel car?

The announcement came from VW at the International Vienna Motor Symposium in Austria. The clean burning diesel trumps its own 2006 TDI model in fuel savings by 12%. The reworked 2.0 liter diesel will bring 60mpg to the market while still being 50-state legal. VW had already been approved for Europe by meeting or exceeding their 2009 Euro-5 standards. Now that the VW BlueTDI engine has passed the EPA’s Bin 5/LEV 2 Emissions rules it will now be permitted to stamp its passport for a voyage across the Atlantic.

The new BlueTDI Jetta arrives on the North American shores pushing 138-hp and 236-ft lbs of torque; both superior improvements in performance over the 2006 model. The last TDI engine for the VW sold in 2006 had 100-hp and 170-ft lbs of torque. As the 2006 model sold for about $24-26,ooo in the US when new, what will the mark-up be on the new BlueTDI? Reports say that the diesel engine will be a scant $2,000 over the MSRP of its gasoline brother.
Photos and Fuel Mileage comparison after the leap

The new Jetta BlueTDI has a number of features that help make it the cleanest burning diesel to come to North America from VW, but it seems as though low emissions are only an EPA and state government concern. If low emissions were the priority of more car and SUV buyers then the few PZEV vehicles sold in the US would have been more popular. Does anyone here know someone driving a Partial Zero Emission Vehicle? So for the new Jetta BlueTDI to really make an impact in the US VW will need to tout the fuel mileage/added cost ratio.

For the sake of argument, if you are shopping a new VW Jetta and are comparing a gasoline SE version to a Diesel SE version it might look something like this. The Jetta SE will have an average price of $22,000 and come with a gasoline fueled 2.0 liter 4-cylinder pumping out 200-hp and 207-torque. The gasoline Jetta SE also averages in fuel mileage 29mpg highway. For a gasoline powered, average sedan those are not bad numbers. However, let us compare that to the new BlueTDI option.

The new Jetta BlueTDI is again the 2.0 liter diesel 4-cylinder with only 138-hp, but a good 238-torque. However, the BlueTDI achieves a pleasing 60mpg on the highway. For a $2,000 increase in MSRP you are doubling the fuel mileage of the gasoline powered Jetta. Now if diesel fuel cost double that of gasoline in the US then it would be a moot point; gasoline wins. As it stands now diesel averages about .60 cents more at the pumps over regular unleaded fuel.

So the basic questions becomes, would you be willing to pay a $2,000 premium and .60 cents more a gallon to achieve twice the fuel mileage? More than likely, most of us on the road today are not even achieving 29mpg on the highway with the car we are driving. Remove the vision of stinky plumes of smoke being emitted from the diesel exhuast, as those days have passed. Is the switch to some cleaner burning, more fuel efficient diesel vehicles beginning to make some sense? Add some hope for biofuels that do not effect our food sources and the future begins to look a little Greener.

[myginpage=04282008-jettabluetdi]

Source[Autopia, GreenCarCongress]

Our Best Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

8 Responses

  1. jordan says:

    Good news, but is it me or is VW losing their style edge? With the exception of the grill and headlights, it looks terribly (whispers:) asian to me. The interior still looks good, of course.

  2. will bee says:

    …wait, wait, wait… You want great fuel mileage AND great design? Is that not like asking for the world?

    You are correct though, Jordan, the most recent design for the Jetta seems to feign good design where really it is lacking. Now if they can put this engine in the GTI that would be a design I could live with. …Just a matter of preference.

  3. Mr Grammer says:

    The correct term is “moot point”.

  4. will bee says:

    Thank you Mr. Grammer for the correction.

    “moot point” repaired.

  5. jordan says:

    Yeah, why do they have to look weird/futuristic or they look like they’re just as light and cheap as possible. Of course they want them as light as possible, but must they look it? Why can’t they just look normal, without even the smug “Hybrid”, or worse, “FlexFuel” on the back? Did you see that south park about the hybrids and the ‘smug’? Classic. Does anyone even know what ethanol is? Or where to get it? My suspicion is that they paid more to get the engine, and are not saving money or the environment now.

    Keep up the good work.

  6. jordan says:

    The correct spelling (unless that’s an actual proper name) is “Grammar”.

    Signed, Mr. Speling.

  7. OldVolksHome says:

    This may be a great alternative to Hybrids for people burning most of their gas on highways instead of in cities.

    (Nice job, jordan!)

  8. used jones says:

    looks like a nissan. kinda boring exterior. I miss the old look of vw when they were really refined. gotta go for used cars these days to find anything slick looking.