Featured Articles

Veteran gets beat up for automotive vandalism

Posted in Best of, Educational, FAIL / Funny, Videos by MrAngry | December 10th, 2011 | 12 Responses |

Racist Navy Veteran

In one corner we’ve got a Navy Veteran. A man who took an oath to protect and serve his country in it’s time of need. In the other corner we’ve got a young man of Asian descent who was verbally abused, and then had his car vandalized because of his race. This resulted in an altercation that ended with the Veteran being the recipient of a broken leg and broken nose. However, during the fray you can clearly hear the vandalized cars owner yelling “Faggot” and “Bitch” at the Veteran. So… on the one hand we’ve got a Veteran who is clearly a racist and criminal and got, in my opinion, exactly what he deserved. However on the other hand, we’ve got the victim and the car owner yelling anti-gay remarks. So is there a winner here, or are both parties simply racists and bigots and in the end, got what they both deserved?

What do you guys think?

Our Best Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

12 Responses

  1. Jim says:

    Why do you sully your great website with crap of this useless nature ? It surprises me how you can actually want to associate this with RideLust – wake up my friend, this cheapens you

  2. Sarge says:

    This was wrong from the start. But, when you step out, make sure you pack the right gear!

    Sarge
    USMC Ret

  3. Sarge says:

    Service or no service – makes no difference who you are, this is wrong. The perp is lucky he just got his butt kicked as it could have been worse. You go around doing this kind of shit, this is how it COULD end.

    Sarge
    USMC Ret

  4. Cars says:

    Why do you have a such cool post like that, cool!

  5. Set says:

    I don’t get why you’d stick around like that after doing it. Plus, I don’t get why you’d video tape this and put it up on the internet. Actually, I don’t understand a single thing about this.

  6. Pozz says:

    The veteran is guilty.
    Because he, out of the nowhere, vandelized someon’s property by judging someone’ race.

    The victim, now seriously pissed off, start cursing him, and we all know that you tend to be carried alway on the cursing.

  7. Mori says:

    Well shows that these asian kids are gracious in victory…

    There is no doubt that the vet was in the wrong, but the Asian guys definitely took it too far. As for the so called “anti-gay remarks” they just sound childish as a gay guy myself this just sounds pitiful. It’s very hard to use those words offensively.

  8. Vernon says:

    The real victim here is the poor car that just happened to be a bystander in the hatred those two men had for each other.

    • Alex says:

      Exactly. Plus, Ridelust, I don’t see what being a bigot or a faggot or racist has anything to do with owning cars. To put it in an extreme sense, are you saying that bigots, faggots (using the term loosely here), racists, etc shouldn’t have nice cars?

      That just doesn’t make sense. The issue here is why did the veteran do this crap, don’t go analyzing the asian dude’s response and making it out to actually mean something. That’s stupid reasoning.

      C’mon Ridelust, or are you going to be the next CarBuzz now?

  9. Alex says:

    Btw, just looked up the reason for the 12-7 US-N. The vet put it on a Japanese car to commemorate the anniversary of Pearl Harbor.

    Wow, seriously vet guy? This was just ignorant. Mess with someone else’s private property to put out your message? Not cool.

  10. Alex says:

    So it wasn’t his race, it was his car. Ridelust is you instigatin’?!

  11. VQ35DE says:

    The owner of the car is white(not asian) and also a member of the evom forums.