Comments on: Smart Car Owners Wise Up, Realize How Fruity They Look

By: Luis Moreno Freire

Luis Moreno Freire — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:54:00 +0000

Retarded, ignorant and full of prejudice. You should not be writing about something that obviusly you don’t know

By: sketch

sketch — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:39:55 +0000

Nevermind that the smart fortwo’s fuel economy (33/41 EPA) is, in fact, not much better than that of the Toyota Yaris (29/36), and once you consider that it requires premium fuel, it becomes little more than a ridiculous fashion statement. At least the Mini Cooper (28/37 MPG), which also requires premium fuel, seats four and drives almost like a real car.

If you want fuel economy, buy a Prius, or an Insight, or a Civic Hybrid, or a diesel Jetta. They all do a much better job of it than the smart with the added benefit of not looking (as) ridiculous and the ability to seat four adults comfortably. If you really want to drive a smart fortwo, move to Europe and buy one with a diesel, because only then will it make some semblance of sense.

By: Vito Rispo

Vito Rispo — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:40:11 +0000

DEVIOUS IS GAY!!!!

By: Devious

Devious — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:42:11 +0000

Excuse my manners, girl.

By: Devious

Devious — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:40:06 +0000

Your an idiot. I say this to the guy who wrote this. This car isn’t “gay”. It’s a step towards the future. In 2030 people won’t be driving the same gas guzzling cars they drive today, and this design may very well be around then. At least something small like it.

There is absolutely no reason small cars or ones like this should be refereed to as “gay”. Just because you don’t drive a muscled up 4 million dollar car doesn’t mean you aren’t heterosexual.

Idiot.

By: Sofar

Sofar — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:50:43 +0000

Smart cars only get 36 miles per gallon? My mum’s Chevy Prizm averages a little over thirty.