<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEMA 2007: Is this a Mad Max Mustang?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ridelust.com/sema-2007-is-this-a-mad-max-mustang/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ridelust.com/sema-2007-is-this-a-mad-max-mustang/</link>
	<description>- Motion + Mobility</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mido</title>
		<link>http://www.ridelust.com/sema-2007-is-this-a-mad-max-mustang/#comment-18976</link>
		<dc:creator>mido</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 22:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ridelust.com/sema-2007-is-this-a-mad-max-mustang/#comment-18976</guid>
		<description>i think the best   cars in like is Honda it`s good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think the best   cars in like is Honda it`s good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.ridelust.com/sema-2007-is-this-a-mad-max-mustang/#comment-1133</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 19:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ridelust.com/sema-2007-is-this-a-mad-max-mustang/#comment-1133</guid>
		<description>Eh, I like it. Don&#039;t know much about it, but it looks pretty good except for a few features. The color is very nice, the effects are alright, and I could live with the hood scoops so long as there was a purpose and this thing was as fast as it looks. I&#039;ll even drive it around with a gun and some harpoons to replicate Mad Max, if you give it to me :)

This thing must produce the deepest of exhaust tones or its just too flashy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh, I like it. Don&#8217;t know much about it, but it looks pretty good except for a few features. The color is very nice, the effects are alright, and I could live with the hood scoops so long as there was a purpose and this thing was as fast as it looks. I&#8217;ll even drive it around with a gun and some harpoons to replicate Mad Max, if you give it to me <img src='http://www.ridelust.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>This thing must produce the deepest of exhaust tones or its just too flashy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.ridelust.com/sema-2007-is-this-a-mad-max-mustang/#comment-1132</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 18:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ridelust.com/sema-2007-is-this-a-mad-max-mustang/#comment-1132</guid>
		<description>I am and always have been a big Mustang fan (and owner), and you are right saying it looks like a return to Mad Max times.  Is that a good thing?  Depends on if picking rusted parts off cars in the desert is appealing to you?

As for this particular car, I don&#039;t hate EVERYTHING about it but it could have been executed better.  There are a lot of conflicting design elements; all the half moon cutouts on the ground effects don&#039;t mesh well with the angular structures on the car.  I don&#039;t understand why the front of the ground effects have the crimped lip below the curved lip?  And lets not forget the huge scoops on the hood, I don&#039;t know if they are functional (about the only thing that might possibly make them cool?).  I could probably even learn to live with them if the half moon crap was taken off of them.

The good stuff?  Rims are nice, paint is nice, ground effects are ok minus the cutouts and crimp in the front end.  My question is.... Is this whole car basically a 3M stick on wus mobile?  Or is there something worth considering under the hood that could even put it in the category of Roush, Shelby or Foose.... something that would make me want to spend similar money for the car?

But this is only an opinion, there has to be someone out there that will love this thing the second they see it.  I&#039;m more of a sleeper kinda guy anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am and always have been a big Mustang fan (and owner), and you are right saying it looks like a return to Mad Max times.  Is that a good thing?  Depends on if picking rusted parts off cars in the desert is appealing to you?</p>
<p>As for this particular car, I don&#8217;t hate EVERYTHING about it but it could have been executed better.  There are a lot of conflicting design elements; all the half moon cutouts on the ground effects don&#8217;t mesh well with the angular structures on the car.  I don&#8217;t understand why the front of the ground effects have the crimped lip below the curved lip?  And lets not forget the huge scoops on the hood, I don&#8217;t know if they are functional (about the only thing that might possibly make them cool?).  I could probably even learn to live with them if the half moon crap was taken off of them.</p>
<p>The good stuff?  Rims are nice, paint is nice, ground effects are ok minus the cutouts and crimp in the front end.  My question is&#8230;. Is this whole car basically a 3M stick on wus mobile?  Or is there something worth considering under the hood that could even put it in the category of Roush, Shelby or Foose&#8230;. something that would make me want to spend similar money for the car?</p>
<p>But this is only an opinion, there has to be someone out there that will love this thing the second they see it.  I&#8217;m more of a sleeper kinda guy anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

