Comments on: Pontiac Aztek vs. Chrysler Sebring: Which Sucked More?

By: ACS

ACS — Tue, 19 Jul 2011 07:58:03 +0000

Definitely the Aztek was more fucked up. The back of it’s a deformed rhombus, and the effin double grill disaster they have going on up in the front just sets a new benchmark for stupid grills (a title previously held by BMW)

By: SPA2TACU5

SPA2TACU5 — Thu, 02 Dec 2010 08:49:36 +0000

I think Pontiac managed to do something no one had ever done before:
set an objective standard, the absolute zero point for ugliness. Bravo!

By: Billy Bo

Billy Bo — Tue, 25 May 2010 14:22:24 +0000

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. If either of these cars wore a Toyota badge, they would have sold 300,000 units a year!

By: Alex

Alex — Mon, 04 May 2009 20:20:41 +0000

TRL – hmm, Sebring vs. Sonata. That would be an interesting comparison – my gut says Sonata (even an old one), but I’d keep an open mind.

But what does it say about a car when you’re comparing it to a 5-year old Korean car? Worst car ever made – probably not, I see your point there. My vote? Chevy Vega, even though (don’t tell anyone) I love the way they look. That was a HEAP.

By: TRL

TRL — Mon, 04 May 2009 15:15:19 +0000

The Aztek will forever be the example of what was wrong with GM. No one in the decision making process had the balls to say – stop this lunacy! No number of GTO’s or G8′s could ever make me take Pontiac seriously again.

The Sebring was a dismal failure as it should have been able to sell somewhere north of 100,000/year, but is not the worst car ever made. For the same money if I had a choice between a new Sebring and maybe a 5 year old Sonata I’m not sure I wouldn’t pick the Sebring.

By: a

Fri, 01 May 2009 21:51:14 +0000

The hideous Aztek is the clear winner

By: Nathan Redden

Nathan Redden — Fri, 01 May 2009 21:44:38 +0000

Though the Aztek was clearly uglier, I’m going to have to say Sebring sucked more. I believe it was Jeremy Clarkson that said “it had the fit and finish of a Chinese water pistol.”