<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Performance Car Bait and Switch.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ridelust.com/performance-car-bait-and-switch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ridelust.com/performance-car-bait-and-switch/</link>
	<description>- Motion + Mobility</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:32:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.ridelust.com/performance-car-bait-and-switch/#comment-47333</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 05:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ridelust.com/?p=76807#comment-47333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I may offer some perspective, the Delorean&#039;s competition in 1981:

-DMC = ~2700 lbs/130hp/0-60 8.5sec
-Porsche 911SC = ~2700 lbs/172hp/0-60 6.3sec
-Ferrari 308GTSi = 3320 lbs GVW 205hp 0-60 7.6sec
-Corvette = 3300 lbs GVW 190hp 0-60 7.2sec
-280-ZX Turbo = 2960 lbs GVW 180hp 0-60 7.1sec

As you can see, the DeLorean wasn’t that far off from its competition at the time.  Thanks to new technology, the figures on all of these cars are not that impressive when compared to current standards with exception to the weight figures.  Most cars today are super heavy.

The DeLorean was launched during a tumultuous gas crisis that John foresaw and wrote about in his book long before the DeLorean car was launched.  He was trying to do something different by providing what he called an ethical sports car that had a reliable engine that also had decent performance and good gas mileage.   The DeLorean also fell victim to new emissions regulations which sapped horsepower and performance.  Thanks to the government, the 70s and 80s were rot with cars without performance.

The DeLorean certainly wasn’t a race winner, but it has a lot of other benefits.  I.e. the car was supposed to have a 25 year warranty so the car was built with materials and products that would last a long time e.g. Stainless Steel.  Safety and comfort were huge goals and only recently have cars been able to match DeLorean safety features.  The DeLorean used a formula 1 style frame developed by Lotus.  It is the same frame, and suspension, used on the Lotus Esprit up until 2002.  So the DeLorean can corner extremely well. 

Ironically, the picture of the DeLorean you have for your article criticizing its performance has a 0-60 time of 5.5 seconds with a 300+ HP turbo engine.  I know because that is a picture of my car which I took several years ago.  I don’t mind you using the picture so long as you give me credit for it. =)

Cheers!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I may offer some perspective, the Delorean&#8217;s competition in 1981:</p>
<p>-DMC = ~2700 lbs/130hp/0-60 8.5sec<br />
-Porsche 911SC = ~2700 lbs/172hp/0-60 6.3sec<br />
-Ferrari 308GTSi = 3320 lbs GVW 205hp 0-60 7.6sec<br />
-Corvette = 3300 lbs GVW 190hp 0-60 7.2sec<br />
-280-ZX Turbo = 2960 lbs GVW 180hp 0-60 7.1sec</p>
<p>As you can see, the DeLorean wasn’t that far off from its competition at the time.  Thanks to new technology, the figures on all of these cars are not that impressive when compared to current standards with exception to the weight figures.  Most cars today are super heavy.</p>
<p>The DeLorean was launched during a tumultuous gas crisis that John foresaw and wrote about in his book long before the DeLorean car was launched.  He was trying to do something different by providing what he called an ethical sports car that had a reliable engine that also had decent performance and good gas mileage.   The DeLorean also fell victim to new emissions regulations which sapped horsepower and performance.  Thanks to the government, the 70s and 80s were rot with cars without performance.</p>
<p>The DeLorean certainly wasn’t a race winner, but it has a lot of other benefits.  I.e. the car was supposed to have a 25 year warranty so the car was built with materials and products that would last a long time e.g. Stainless Steel.  Safety and comfort were huge goals and only recently have cars been able to match DeLorean safety features.  The DeLorean used a formula 1 style frame developed by Lotus.  It is the same frame, and suspension, used on the Lotus Esprit up until 2002.  So the DeLorean can corner extremely well. </p>
<p>Ironically, the picture of the DeLorean you have for your article criticizing its performance has a 0-60 time of 5.5 seconds with a 300+ HP turbo engine.  I know because that is a picture of my car which I took several years ago.  I don’t mind you using the picture so long as you give me credit for it. =)</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wing nut</title>
		<link>http://www.ridelust.com/performance-car-bait-and-switch/#comment-40112</link>
		<dc:creator>Wing nut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 01:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ridelust.com/?p=76807#comment-40112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was the &#039;80&#039;s. Everything was slow. Damn good looking though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was the &#8217;80&#8242;s. Everything was slow. Damn good looking though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peterman</title>
		<link>http://www.ridelust.com/performance-car-bait-and-switch/#comment-39961</link>
		<dc:creator>Peterman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ridelust.com/?p=76807#comment-39961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[meant to add this...

http://www.geekologie.com/2011/03/08/delorean-trailer.jpg]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>meant to add this&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.geekologie.com/2011/03/08/delorean-trailer.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.geekologie.com/2011/03/08/delorean-trailer.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peterman</title>
		<link>http://www.ridelust.com/performance-car-bait-and-switch/#comment-39960</link>
		<dc:creator>Peterman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ridelust.com/?p=76807#comment-39960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s not forget how practical it can be!

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s not forget how practical it can be!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turbosrt</title>
		<link>http://www.ridelust.com/performance-car-bait-and-switch/#comment-39873</link>
		<dc:creator>turbosrt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ridelust.com/?p=76807#comment-39873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was slow and unreliable but in its defense John Delorean had a twin turbo version in development and didnt have enough time to work out the kinks in the car. I feel if he was given the chance to continue the company it could have became something special. Of course the basement full of drugs in his house which he hadnt been to in 3 months (Framed) put an end to it all. Dont forget the same man helped create the legendary GTO.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was slow and unreliable but in its defense John Delorean had a twin turbo version in development and didnt have enough time to work out the kinks in the car. I feel if he was given the chance to continue the company it could have became something special. Of course the basement full of drugs in his house which he hadnt been to in 3 months (Framed) put an end to it all. Dont forget the same man helped create the legendary GTO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paully W</title>
		<link>http://www.ridelust.com/performance-car-bait-and-switch/#comment-39872</link>
		<dc:creator>Paully W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ridelust.com/?p=76807#comment-39872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just went 1.21 giggawatts in my pants.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just went 1.21 giggawatts in my pants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 68SportFury</title>
		<link>http://www.ridelust.com/performance-car-bait-and-switch/#comment-39871</link>
		<dc:creator>68SportFury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ridelust.com/?p=76807#comment-39871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sure goes a long way towards explaining why they dubbed in that nice V8 rumble in the &quot;Back to the Future&quot; movies, doesn&#039;t it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure goes a long way towards explaining why they dubbed in that nice V8 rumble in the &#8220;Back to the Future&#8221; movies, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
