<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marijuana And Actual Driving Performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ridelust.com/marijuana-and-actual-driving-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ridelust.com/marijuana-and-actual-driving-performance/</link>
	<description>- Motion + Mobility</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sceptic</title>
		<link>http://www.ridelust.com/marijuana-and-actual-driving-performance/#comment-10538</link>
		<dc:creator>Sceptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ridelust.com/?p=14679#comment-10538</guid>
		<description>When I was in 7th grade, in 1987, someone in my class did a report on how mosquitoes spread HIV/AIDS. I know, that comment seems unrelated to this article... but did anyone see when this &quot;study&quot; was originally conducted? 1993! Why would anyone site sources so old?? 

Also, did anyone READ the actual study? It&#039;s full of contradictions. The Abstract says the first test was performed 30 and 90 minutes after smoking and the Methods section says 40 minutes and an hour later.

How can a study who&#039;s Final Report date of November 1993 site sources from 1995?

Does the U.S. Government measure in metric?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was in 7th grade, in 1987, someone in my class did a report on how mosquitoes spread HIV/AIDS. I know, that comment seems unrelated to this article&#8230; but did anyone see when this &#8220;study&#8221; was originally conducted? 1993! Why would anyone site sources so old?? </p>
<p>Also, did anyone READ the actual study? It&#8217;s full of contradictions. The Abstract says the first test was performed 30 and 90 minutes after smoking and the Methods section says 40 minutes and an hour later.</p>
<p>How can a study who&#8217;s Final Report date of November 1993 site sources from 1995?</p>
<p>Does the U.S. Government measure in metric?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yeah!</title>
		<link>http://www.ridelust.com/marijuana-and-actual-driving-performance/#comment-9954</link>
		<dc:creator>yeah!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 22:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ridelust.com/?p=14679#comment-9954</guid>
		<description>I think the best way to combat the anti-marijuana fervor is through good scientific research.  This article is an excellent example, by citing legitimate sources the author came up with a valid conclusion...you are a better driver when stoned then when you are drunk.

I think scientific studies highlighting the positive effects of cannabis are the key to winning against the ignorant.

Thank you so much for enlightening us!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the best way to combat the anti-marijuana fervor is through good scientific research.  This article is an excellent example, by citing legitimate sources the author came up with a valid conclusion&#8230;you are a better driver when stoned then when you are drunk.</p>
<p>I think scientific studies highlighting the positive effects of cannabis are the key to winning against the ignorant.</p>
<p>Thank you so much for enlightening us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

