Comments on: Lexus LFA vs Acura NSX! – Head 2 Head http://www.ridelust.com/lexus-lfa-vs-acura-nsx-head-2-head/ - Motion + Mobility Mon, 20 May 2013 12:40:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: turbosrt http://www.ridelust.com/lexus-lfa-vs-acura-nsx-head-2-head/#comment-70468 turbosrt Fri, 27 Jul 2012 11:13:28 +0000 http://www.ridelust.com/?p=90912#comment-70468 Have to be honest. The NSX was the most blown out of proportion car I have ever seen. The numbers were not impressive even for its time and the pricetag was violently high for being diven by a honda engine. It handled very well but a supercar it was not. The LFA is just “This is what we can make if you can afford to pay $375,000″. Its not special. Viper and ZR1 can pull those numbers or better for around 275 grand less. At least the LFA is not a rebadged toyota like every other car in the Lexus lineup. I give them that.

]]> By: djrosa http://www.ridelust.com/lexus-lfa-vs-acura-nsx-head-2-head/#comment-70429 djrosa Thu, 26 Jul 2012 22:40:00 +0000 http://www.ridelust.com/?p=90912#comment-70429 2 of four japanese supercars?

Mitsubishi 2000gt
nissan skyline r32,33,34
nissan GTR (skyline r 35)
honda nsx
Lexus LFA
Toyota supra
nissan 300zx
nissan 240z (260z,280z)
subaru svx, xt
mazda RX7

i can go on but i think ive made my point. and if you want to say some of these arent supercars then just think about the specs on the NSX which arent that high (dont get me wrong i love the thing to bits) and you can compare it to some of the other cars ive alligned

and also sorry for being an anorak but i really cant help it

]]>