10 Most Kick-Ass Police Cars
 
Top Ten Favorite Cars Of Retirees (AKA: Top Ten Cars To Avoid On The Road)
 
The 50 Most Famous Cars Of All Time
 
Top 10 Everyday Things People Do To Ruin Their Cars
 

Future Mazda MX-5 Miata Gets Even Lighter In The Loafers

Officially unveiled a few weeks ago in Paris, the 2009 Mazda MX-5 Miata isn’t a radical departure from the current model’s aesthetics – but Mazda has big plans for the future. According to MX-5 program manager Takao Kijima, Mazda’s future plans for alternative powertrains could seek to reduce the MX-5’s total weight by about 10%.

Ultimately leaning towards designs that would scale the MX-5 Miata down to a size smaller than 1989 models, Kijima explains that overall weight reduction is necessitated if Mazda is to be successful with their larger goal, which is engineering a new, fuel-sipping Mazda MX-5. Trimming a few pounds would help the MX-5 achieve a lower rate of fuel consumption as well as reduce emissions, effectively making the compact little car even more environmentally friendly than it already is.

In addition to shedding a few, Mazda also plans to design a new fuel-efficient powertrain, in the form of either a diesel or hybrid engine. Currently, Kijima admits a diesel application is more likely, since the added weight of the requisite hybrid battery pack would make Mazda’s goal of lightening the MX-5’s load significantly harder. “[Keeping the weight of a hybrid down] is a big headache,” Kijima explains. “Packaging is another big problem with a hybrid.” Despite the setbacks, Kijima hints that the MX-5’s future is almost certainly tinted a shade of green. “I would say the chance of a diesel or hybrid engine [for MX-5] is more than 50 per cent.”

[Source: Drive.com]

Related Articles:

RideLust Features

Comments

There are 1 comment telling it like it is...? Have your say!

  1. Ha! Lighter in the Loafers! So the new generation is lighter AND gayer. Who’d have thunk it.

    Words by Klitorisaurus on October 12, 2008 at 5:18 am | #



What do you think?