<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BMW M Concept Rendered As Fantasy Rival to Audi&#8217;s R8</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ridelust.com/bmw-m-concept-rendered-as-fantasy-rival-to-audis-r8/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ridelust.com/bmw-m-concept-rendered-as-fantasy-rival-to-audis-r8/</link>
	<description>- Motion + Mobility</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:26:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.ridelust.com/bmw-m-concept-rendered-as-fantasy-rival-to-audis-r8/#comment-10490</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 05:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ridelust.com/?p=23372#comment-10490</guid>
		<description>What is Anvil? You see, that&#039;s the problem, no one knows. Just type it into google. Anvilthemovie.com is the first to come up, and the wiki article is the second. 

As for the M Concept, I&#039;m not sure generic is the right word, although the M1 is certainly more evocative either way. I think maybe--&quot;rendering&quot; defines the look quite nicely, because any rendered car is going to look a bit too good--and too ugly--and too dramatic to ever make it to the streets. They look the same because they all try to look different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is Anvil? You see, that&#8217;s the problem, no one knows. Just type it into google. Anvilthemovie.com is the first to come up, and the wiki article is the second. </p>
<p>As for the M Concept, I&#8217;m not sure generic is the right word, although the M1 is certainly more evocative either way. I think maybe&#8211;&#8221;rendering&#8221; defines the look quite nicely, because any rendered car is going to look a bit too good&#8211;and too ugly&#8211;and too dramatic to ever make it to the streets. They look the same because they all try to look different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Kierstein</title>
		<link>http://www.ridelust.com/bmw-m-concept-rendered-as-fantasy-rival-to-audis-r8/#comment-10474</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Kierstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ridelust.com/?p=23372#comment-10474</guid>
		<description>What is Anvil?

And while that concept looks nice in a generic sort of way, I like the M1 homage better: http://jalopnik.com/384455/bmw-m1-homage-concept-revealed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is Anvil?</p>
<p>And while that concept looks nice in a generic sort of way, I like the M1 homage better: <a href="http://jalopnik.com/384455/bmw-m1-homage-concept-revealed" rel="nofollow">http://jalopnik.com/384455/bmw-m1-homage-concept-revealed</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

